One of the more telling offseason metrics in college football is returning production, and NC State enters the 2026 season somewhere in the middle of the pack nationally.
According to the returning production rankings, the Wolfpack brings back 54% of its production from the 2025 season, ranking 58th nationally and ninth among the 17 ACC programs.
While the overall number is average compared to the rest of the conference, the breakdown tells a much different story on each side of the ball.
| Rank |
Team |
Returning Production |
Offense (Rank) |
Defense (Rank) |
| 1 |
Notre Dame |
72% |
67% (19) |
77% (2) |
| 2 |
Maryland |
71% |
68% (17) |
74% (4) |
| 3 |
Nebraska |
69% |
69% (14) |
69% (7) |
| 4 |
Virginia Tech |
69% |
71% (9) |
67% (8) |
| 5 |
South Carolina |
68% |
76% (2) |
61% (30) |
| 6 |
Texas |
68% |
73% (4) |
63% (19) |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
68% |
71% (10) |
65% (12) |
| 8 |
Georgia |
68% |
63% (32) |
72% (5) |
| 9 |
UCLA |
67% |
73% (5) |
61% (29) |
| 10 |
Florida |
66% |
55% (66) |
77% (1) |
| 11 |
Oregon |
66% |
65% (26) |
66% (11) |
| 12 |
Texas Tech |
65% |
67% (20) |
64% (17) |
| 13 |
USC |
65% |
67% (22) |
64% (16) |
| 14 |
Texas A&M |
65% |
67% (21) |
63% (18) |
| 15 |
Washington |
65% |
69% (13) |
61% (27) |
| 16 |
Oklahoma |
65% |
75% (3) |
55% (57) |
| 17 |
Houston |
65% |
71% (7) |
58% (44) |
| 18 |
BYU |
64% |
59% (50) |
69% (6) |
| 19 |
FAU |
64% |
62% (34) |
65% (14) |
| 20 |
Michigan |
63% |
72% (6) |
55% (55) |
| 21 |
New Mexico |
63% |
68% (16) |
58% (40) |
| 22 |
SMU |
62% |
66% (23) |
58% (38) |
| 23 |
Tulsa |
62% |
64% (28) |
60% (36) |
| 24 |
Eastern Michigan |
62% |
59% (52) |
64% (15) |
| 25 |
Delaware |
62% |
62% (38) |
62% (24) |
| … |
| 58 |
NC State |
54% |
62% (39) |
46% (84) |
More Continuity on Offense
NC State returns significantly more experience offensively than defensively.
The Wolfpack brings back 62% of its offensive production, which ranks 39th nationally and fourth in the ACC.
That continuity should benefit an offense led by returning starting quarterback CJ Bailey, while several key skill-position contributors and offensive linemen also return for another season.
With more than three-fifths of last year’s offensive production returning, NC State enters the season with a solid foundation on that side of the ball.
Defense Faces a Major Reset
The defensive numbers paint a different picture.
The Wolfpack returns just 46% of its defensive production, ranking 84th nationally and 15th out of 17 ACC teams.
That isn’t entirely surprising considering the number of veteran defenders who exhausted their eligibility or moved on following the 2025 season.
Replacing that experience will likely require several younger players and transfers to step into expanded roles immediately.
While the defense returns less proven production, it also creates opportunities for new contributors to emerge throughout the season.
Where NC State Ranks in the ACC
Overall, the Wolfpack sits almost exactly in the middle of the conference.
| ACC Rank |
National Rank |
Team |
Returning Production |
Offense (Rank) |
Defense (Rank) |
| 1 |
4 |
Virginia Tech |
69% |
71% (9) |
67% (8) |
| 2 |
22 |
SMU |
62% |
66% (23) |
58% (38) |
| 3 |
27 |
Syracuse |
62% |
56% (63) |
67% (9) |
| 4 |
33 |
Stanford |
60% |
58% (54) |
62% (21) |
| 5 |
36 |
Virginia |
59% |
55% (65) |
62% (20) |
| 6 |
41 |
Pittsburgh |
58% |
60% (49) |
56% (49) |
| 7 |
43 |
California |
58% |
70% (11) |
45% (90) |
| 8 |
48 |
Florida State |
57% |
57% (58) |
57% (47) |
| 9 |
58 |
NC State |
54% |
62% (39) |
46% (84) |
| 10 |
59 |
Clemson |
53% |
46% (94) |
61% (26) |
| 11 |
60 |
Louisville |
53% |
52% (73) |
55% (61) |
| 12 |
62 |
Wake Forest |
53% |
45% (96) |
61% (33) |
| 13 |
73 |
Boston College |
50% |
44% (101) |
57% (48) |
| 14 |
77 |
Duke |
49% |
48% (87) |
51% (72) |
| 15 |
78 |
Miami |
49% |
48% (85) |
51% (74) |
| 16 |
79 |
Georgia Tech |
49% |
37% (117) |
61% (28) |
| 17 |
103 |
North Carolina |
44% |
47% (91) |
42% (102) |
The split between offense and defense is one of the more dramatic in the league.
Only three ACC teams return more offensive production than NC State, while only Georgia Tech and North Carolina return less on the defensive side of the ball.
Virginia Tech Leads the Conference
Virginia Tech enters the season as the ACC leader in returning production, bringing back 69% of last year’s production, which also ranks fourth nationally.
SMU (62%) and Syracuse (62%) round out the conference’s top three.
At the other end of the spectrum, North Carolina returns just 44% of its production, the lowest mark in the ACC.
Why Returning Production Matters… and Why It Doesn’t
Returning production can be a useful indicator of continuity, but it shouldn’t be viewed as a prediction of future success.
Programs with experienced returning rosters often begin the season with more established chemistry, while teams replacing significant production can experience growing pains.
However, in today’s Transfer Portal era, returning production is only one piece of the puzzle.
Teams can quickly replace departing starters with experienced transfers, making roster quality just as important as roster continuity.
For NC State, the numbers suggest the offense should enter the season with greater stability, while the defense may require more time to develop as new faces step into larger roles.